The statement from Charlton Athletic yesterday concerning speculation around the appointment of a new manager attempted to absolve Thomas Sandgaard from any responsibility for the ongoing failure to name anyone and perhaps, unhelpfully, confirm that Ben Garner has not been appointed (yet?).
Social media has changed the game in terms of communications and managing it is critical, especially for big businesses with high numbers of interested 'customers.' Done well and it can be a powerful medium - but done badly and it can ruin you. The WIOTOS acronym (When It's On The Official Site) is often cited amongst supporters but the club has a responsibility to manage communications before anything is finally confirmed on it's website or else it ends up in the position it has found itself in.
What is clear is that champion local journalist (SLP) Rich Cawley had enough evidence to announce the impending appointment of Swindon's Ben Garner on 25th May as the next manager. With hindsight, he may have jumped the gun but if he has two good sources confirming the same thing, then he is safe to go. The speculation that has followed, largely from supporters, has not helped but the club has allowed this to happen. Where was the cast-iron Non-Disclosure-Agreement (NDA) that should have prevented the few people in the know from leaking anything about his possible appointment or invoked a quick end to negotiations if they did leak anything?
Since then we have had fans telling us that the delay is over Swindon's compensation, Garner's salary, bonus or exit terms as well as his desired management team. Speculation over the possible appointment of Swindon's Director of Football who resigned suddenly last week has also stoked the fires.
Unhelpful Tweets from Thomas Sandgaard and Raelynn Moroney haven't helped, even if what they have said has been factually correct i.e. no final decision has been taken. All that has served to do is strengthen the rumours as to why not.
This failure now leaves us in a position where Sandgaard may now be forced to ditch the manager he had chosen (possibly after being rejected by his preferred choice/s) because he decides he now needs to bring things to a closure on the Garner front or possibly complete his appointment which could look reluctant. Neither outcome is a winner for Charlton Athletic.
Confirming that Garner won't be the new manager might mean we have lost a candidate he was convinced by and/or result in an ongoing delay to appoint someone else which threatens to disrupt our pre-season preparation for a second year. Appointing him would need a pretty good explanation to accommodate the delay and that would likely confirm at least some of the speculation which really wouldn't be helpful. Did he really lose Michael Beale or Matt Taylor over his preferred recruitment approach? Is he expecting to get someone on the cheap or on unrealistic exit terms? Are we focused more on avoiding failure than achieving success?
Do we really want to appoint a manager who believes he has to compromise too much over recruitment, who can't have the team he believes he needs to be successful around him or who will start the job unhappy with his remuneration or the clubs ability to tear-up his contract without any significant costs? Any of those issues would inevitably affect player recruitment too and that doesn't bode well for a happy ship.
In the wider world, we look like a club in permanent turmoil. One that continues to lose and who makes a hash of nearly everything it does. Supporters increasingly lose interest and the decline of the club goes on. Most of this could be avoided if the club was properly managing comms, but it isn't. Mr and Mrs Owner need to stop replying to supporter Tweets about sensitive club negotiations.
Finally, we are reminded once again that what we need is an experienced CEO who is at the club everyday, providing hands-on leadership and co-ordinating the various teams running the affairs of the club. Brian Jokat clearly isn't doing that in his COO role and perhaps it was never his remit although he was offered up as a part-solution when Sandgaard appointed him.
This is the sixth week since Jackson was told his contract wouldn't be renewed. The players are due back to pre-season training next week and the fixtures will be out too. Sandgaard will be in town this week and I expect a new manager to be appointed whilst he is here if the turmoil is to be ended. The club needs to fully answer a number of questions when it makes that appointment in order to draw a line under all of this and try to get everyone looking forward and moving in step. Perhaps, some really positive and timely player recruitment can get a squad up-to-full strength before the season starts on 30th July and to get us off on a winning start this time. We live in hope.
Don’t like this owner. Varney and Barclay brother would been better bet. Don’t be surprised if this Pratt of an owner puts his son in charge.
ReplyDeleteNot sure many would disagree but Barclay didn't buy the club.
DeleteBe assured! TS has everything in hand but cannot yet declare his position. There will be an announcement in the next week or so which will restore your faith, there’s a lot going on behind the scenes regarding new signings as well, it will be onwards and upwards as has been promised.
ReplyDeleteI am expecting an annoucement in the next week but not confident it will restore my faith. As I said, Garner now looks compromised, and if it's someone else, it needs to be a demonstrably better choice than anyone we have seen linked so far....
DeleteLets hope it's Curbs!
DeleteCan only agree, we are becoming a joke. I have supported this great club for over 60 years. Come on Thomas announce the new manager and get some decent signings in and mount a serious promotion challenge.
ReplyDeleteThomas we are all grateful for your financial support and saving us but together we can achieve a lot more !!
Brilliant assessment! I’m a Swindon supporter, and whilst I know that our situation is not your priority, the Charlton dithering is devastating for us. What happens at our end if Garner is eventually rejected by Sandgaard? Who knows! Football is the loser from this sort of amateurish recruitment fiasco.
ReplyDeleteThe leak may well have come from the Swindon side (Garner, an agent or the club) in order to pressure Charlton in concluding a deal. If so, there won't be much sympathy for Swindon or Garner I am afraid. If we have cocked up here, then perhaps we might have expected Charlton to have concluded a quicker deal (accepting responsibility)?
DeleteIt is normal practice in professional journalism to confirm a story from source. Until this is confirmed, it is only hearsay not fact. It is NOT up to the news item to add or deny a story. A good motto is “NEVER ever talk to a journalist or TV reporter, until the full truthful information is to hand.” Enjoy the 2022/23 season all.
ReplyDeleteI have no doubt Rich Cawley had at least two sources for his story. He did say that the deal was done subject to 'any last minute hitches.'
DeleteSurely you mean Bob Hope and no hope...........and Bob's already left the building.
ReplyDeleteUtterly shambolic.
Dave thanks for the cohesive explanation of the ever deepering mess that I and many fans have felt but were unable to explain clearly and succinctly words as you have been able to. Paul
ReplyDeleteWell thought out article. Let’s hope the situation can be resolved quickly now.
ReplyDeleteI firmly believe this is a ploy on the part of Mr S. to sell the club sooner rather than later. He will state that he has become frustrated with events, and, in the bigger picture, he would wish to pass over the problems of running the Club, (which he never got to grips with from the start), to some other well meaning individual, and so the continuing decline of CAFC goes rolling on........
ReplyDeleteIf just wanted to sell, why not just leave Jackson in charge?
DeleteThe phrase drama queen springs to mind, chill out. Fans and bloggers want everything and they want it now. Be realistic. It’s a short off season and many clubs are after the same players and in some cases managers. They will hold out for the best deal. We are a mid table div 1 club. Fortunately we have an owner who has stabilised the club, get behind him instead of unknown sources and click bait.
ReplyDeleteThis is stability? I'd hate to see a mess.
DeleteThomas turning out to be a real enigma . I listen to what he has to say and where his motivation at the beginning was very simple "European football within 5 years " a rather large dose of reality seems to have sent him doolally in what he really can achieve at Charlton. I think now as in most things in life we need a large slice of overdue Lady Luck to help him(us) out .
ReplyDeleteKeep the faith , Lennie who , Grit and Curbs , valley condemned .
Never been accused of being a Drama Queen before! I don't see any other clubs making such a horlicks of appointing a new manager. Holding out for the best deal may mean we miss out on our preferred candidate, if we haven't already. I am not commenting on unknown sources or click-bait, merely giving my opinion about the ongoing deay in appointing anyone and the behaviour of the owner and his partner.
ReplyDeleteGood article!
ReplyDeleteOnce the owner sacked JJ the hunt for a successor should have been carried out diligently and at pace. Neither objective has been achieved giving the impression that when an announcement is it is is not part of a grand master plan but rather a panic appointment. I cannot see how the delay is helping assemble a squad capable of a challenge next season.
ReplyDeleteThe clue in that comment is "off season" Dave. Obviously written by an American. Wonder who...
ReplyDeleteThe phrase if you're in a hole STOP DIGGING is appropriate! Maybe it is not known in USA or Denmark
ReplyDeleteExcellent overview of the situation.
ReplyDeleteThe total naive mismanagement of the social media element has only stoked the fires of negativity.
Whatever prompted The owners girlfriend to post a Twitter reply beggars belief ,particularly given he woman has a PhD!