I received interesting feedback from readers last night;
Daggs disagreed with my assessment of the second half and thought we were lucky not to draw. He is concerned that we don't have a "Plan B" and that was a question posed to Phil Parkinson on a couple of occasions at the recent Q & A. I'll concede we weren't as good in the second period yesterday but Exeter would have been fortunate to leave SE7 with a point and their manager said much after the game. In terms of Plan B, we do look fairly limited but that's largely down to the quality of the strikers we have. To be fair to PP he did change it yesterday by bringing McLeod on and, lucky or not, it was McLeod who put away the second goal to win the game even if the formation remained the same. The introduction of Wagstaff also allowed Bailey to play in the middle and Sam to swap wings. I guess what Daggs (and an Anonymous commentator) was really getting at was our ability to go to 4-4-2. This is definitely my preferred formation and one that I am desperate to see again but you need the players to do it well, and we are simply too good in midfield and well short upfront with the squad we have. Parkinson was at pains to point out that Shelvey does operate as a second striker and that we are more often than not playing a 4-4-1-1 as opposed to a 4-5-1 that it looks on paper. Having said all that, Burton and McLeod probably deserve a good run together but I think we need to choose our moments for this. When we did it earlier in the season against Wycombe (albeit with McLeod and Gray) it nearly cost us the lead. We are unbeaten with the current formation and the time for 4-4-2 will come either when we are safe (two up late on, or three up) or when we are chasing a game and running out of ideas.
Chicago Addick expressed a concern that we are not closing games out and I guess at the late goals being conceded as invariably defend deep towards the end of games. Again a good point and I think we have the players to attack for larger periods of games than we are doing (particularly once we are in front) and particularly towards the end of matches when opposing players may be tiring and as vulnerable as we appear to be. We slow down in the second half but maybe that's inevitable after our typical first half exertions to take control in games. I think the need to attack is even greater away from home where it's difficult to keep a clean sheet if you go out looking to defend and rely on the counter-attack.
Mike then made the most sensible comment of all, in that Leeds winning at MK Dons shouldn't be seen as bad news for us as it denied MK Dons vital points and helped widen the gap between the top two and the play-off chasers. My blinkers here are because of a longstanding dislike of Leeds United and the fact that I have an armchair-supporting Leeds mate whose match-day texts manage to annoy me intensely and who won't allow me to forget the thrashing they gave us at the Valley the last time we met. What I wouldn't give for a win at Elland Road next week. I am also of the opinion that we need to be front runners this season in order to survive a late season loss of form so I don't want to see us look like we are settling for second place after such a solid start. If the pursuit of Leeds and top spot means we build up a healthy lead over third, then maybe that will be good enough.
I also forgot yesterday to mention Craig Noone who played on the left wing for Exeter in the first half and the right in the second (although Blackheath Addick noticed him too which reminded me). He gave Fraser Richardson a hard forty-five and beat him comprehensively on a couple of occasions, so it was a surprise to see him switched over although Richardson was giving as good as he good by the break. It was also Noone who slipped through for the disallowed goal which looked ok to me at the time.
I should also say that it was another surprisingly decent crowd at the Valley of 16,867, the biggest in League One yesterday and more than Coventry got in the Championship for the visit of ex-Premier league Boro. A full 50% more than QPR-ha-ha managed at home to Barnsley. Exeter also brought a few hundred more than I had given them credit for.
Leeds' last gasp winner wasn't the only one in our division with fewer than six goals arriving with the last two minutes of matches; Kuffour scored Bristol Rovers late equaliser that I missed when posting yesterday; Radhi earned Pardew a late point at Carlisle; Daryl Russell netted late for Norwich to take a point at Gillingham and Chambers did the same for Wycombe at Swindon. maybe it'll be our turn on Tuesday. I am going to the game and we should have a good vocal backing with over 1600 tickets sold up to yesterday.
Come on you Reds!
Yus mate, that's a reasonable assessment of where i was heading.
ReplyDeleteI too thought Noone had a terrific game against us and was surprised when he was subbed.
Our best bit of proffesionalism for months took place right in front of me, during added time.
Izzy and Lloyd playing 'keep it in the corner' quality !
I also thought that your comment last night was a little too upbeat and tend to agree with this more balanced assessment. The most encouraging thing yesterday though was that we managed to win without playing well and that is what successful teams need to do.
ReplyDeleteI too am a little concerned by the apparent lack of a so-called Plan B, but we have scored 20 goals and no less than 9 players have already got on the score sheet and that is very encouraging.
I think Parky really knows what he is doing, but I reckon we'll learn a lot from 3 of the next 4 games, i.e. Colchester A and then Oldham and Huddersfield at home. For my money these are much more important than Leeds away because they are the kind of games we haven't played yet but which we'll need to win if we are going to do well this season. It'll be very interesting to see how we do.
451 will serve us well against the top teams in the division, particularly away. We may surprise next week against Leeds.
ReplyDeleteI think that currently we don't have the players to play 442. It didn't help at all against Wycombe. If we can work how to provide proper protection for the centre backs, then we should give it a go. Against Wycombe they were painfully exposed.
vff
Excellent assessment of the match. I too thought that Noone was Exeter's best player by far and was surprised he was taken off. Might be one for us to look out for in the future....he seemed full of energy and enthusiasm!!
ReplyDelete451 will serve us well against the top teams in the division, particularly away from home. We may surprise a few against Leeds.
ReplyDeleteWe don't have the personnel for 442. Against Wycombe it just didn't work as the centre backs were left exposed and we were over run.
If we can manage how to work out how to protect the centre backs then it may be ok. Sodje may be a better centre back for 442 then Llera.
Parkinson made some astute substitutions yesterday, bringing on the right players at the right time.
vff
Am I the only one who thinks that Jonjo Shelvey is confused to what his role is at times - and (not surprisingly) has stramina problems most games for the last 20-25 minutes.
ReplyDelete